Sociology of literature

Everywhere & Nowhere: The Sociology of Literature After “the Sociology of Literature”

pp. v-xxiii Article

Bạn đang xem: Sociology of literature

The “Sociology of Literature” has always named a polyglot và rather incoherent set of enterprises. It is scattered across so many separate domains & subdomains of scholarly retìm kiếm, each with its own distinct agendas of theory and method, that it scarcely even rates the designation of a “field.”1 But for purposes of clarity và simplicity, I will focus here on the fate of sociology in the recent history of literary studies. Is literary studies actively invested at present in the project of sustaining a sociology of literature? As currently configured, và facing the particular disciplinary circumstances that we vì chưng, are literary scholars capable of producing a new sociology of literature? Would they be favorably disposed toward one if it came their way?

One hesitates khổng lồ answer such questions in the affirmative sầu. New or old, the sociology of literature seems to lớn possess little traction in literary studies. Notoàn thân appears to lớn regret the passing of an “old” sociology of literature, invoked these days (where it is invoked at all) as a stale and outmoded approach, like reader-response or archetypal criticism, barely worth a chapter in the latest theory anthology. But nor would many literary scholars embrace the prospect—as they perceive it—of a new sociological turn, of a more “sociological” future for literary studies. If the old sociology of literature seems all too old, a superseded relic of an earlier moment in the discipline, a new sociology of literature can seem all too contemporary, in step with ominous trends that are driving humanistic inquiry toward some small, sad corner of the increasingly social-science-dominated academy lớn endure an “interdisciplinary” afterlife of collaborative sầu truyền thông media research.

I am speaking here of images và perceptions, of what the phrase “sociology of literature” might conjure up in the disciplinary imaginary of the Eng Lit or Comp Lit professoriate. I am not speaking about any actual program of research, about attempts to connect the core mission of sociology with that of literary studies, articulating in new, more thorough, or more provocative ways the social súc tích of literary texts và practices and/or the literary forms of social texts và practices. That multifaceted enterprise is alive sầu and well, as I believe sầu anyone awake lớn the excitements of our profession should be aware, và as the essays in this special issue of NLH vibrantly affirm.

But there is the image problem, this resistance, at the very least, khổng lồ the nomenclature, this need lớn place scare quotes around the phrase itself. “The sociology of literature”: something critics tried lớn bởi a long time ago, or (more worryingly) something critics are starting to lớn vì chưng today instead of the proper tasks of literary history & criticism. When exactly did this distancing become habitual, and why? Rita Felski and I embarked on this project partly as a way lớn address those questions. Having entered graduate school in the early 1980s, we well rethành viên when “the sociology of literature” was a term widely in use by literary scholars và critical theorists alượt thích. This was especially true in Britain which, as Raymond Williams observed, remained into the 1970s a “backward—indeed an undeveloped country” with respect to lớn sociology as an academic discipline.2 With little in the way of an institutional establishment to lớn hinder them, British scholars whose training and higher degrees were in literature could make không lấy phí with the mantle of “sociologist.” In addition to Williams himself (whose visiting appointment at Stanford in 1973–74 was in the social sciences rather than the humanities), one thinks here of Richard Hoggart (labeled a sociologist in most bibliographies and encyclopedias) và Stuart Hall (who was named Professor of Sociology at the mở cửa University in 1979), as well as younger figures like Francis Barker, Colin Mercer, và Grasi Murdock, all of whom came lớn be at least as closely associated with sociology as with English. Between the mid-1970s & the mid-1980s, these sociologically inclined literary critics worked productively alongside an emergent generation of cultural sociologists (Tony Bennett, John Hall, Andrew Milner, David Morley, Charlotte Brunsdon, Jim McGuigan, Janet Wolff, & many others...

Xem thêm:


Xem thêm:

If you would lượt thích to lớn authenticate using a different subscribed institution or have sầu your own login và password khổng lồ Project

Chuyên mục: literature